Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977

Commonwealth v. Rose

Commonwealth v. Rose
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 3, 1977 · Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins
246 Pa. Super. 343; 370 A.2d 1223; 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1940

Commonwealth v. Rose

Dissenting Opinion

PRICE and VAN der VOORT,

JJ.-, dissent for the reasons stated in the Dissenting Opinion in Commonwealth v. Malone, supra.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Appellant contends that she has a right to have her arrest record expunged. Because it believed that it did not

*344have the authority to reach that issue, the lower court denied appellant’s petition. This Court recently held that such authority does exist. See Commonwealth v. Malone, 244 Pa.Super. 62, 366 A.2d 584 (1976). Therefore, we remand to the lower court for further consideration in light of our holding in Commonwealth v. Malone, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.