Commonwealth v. Pope
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Pope, 250 Pa. Super. 626 (1977)
379 A.2d 603
Hoffman, Poindexter, Spaeth, Stated
Commonwealth v. Pope
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The order of the lower court sustaining appellee’s post-trial motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth on the issue of appellee’s lack of a license is reversed for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977). The record is remanded for consideration of remaining post-trial motions, if any. If the lower court decides that remaining post-trial motions are without merit, it shall proceed to judgment of sentence.
Reference
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published