Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978

Commonwealth v. Gray

Commonwealth v. Gray
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 7, 1978 · Determination, File, Jacobs, Knowingly, Lower, Motions, Price, Remand, Right, Schroth, Tate, Voort, Waived
252 Pa. Super. 621; 382 A.2d 748

Commonwealth v. Gray

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence vacated. The case is remanded for the entry of post-trial motions nunc pro tunc.

JACOBS and PRICE, JJ., dissent. VAN der VOORT, J., dissents and would remand to the lower court for a determination of whether appellant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to file post-trial motions. Commonwealth v. Tate, 464 Pa. 25, 346 A.2d 1 (1975); Commonwealth v. Schroth, 458 Pa. 233, 328 A.2d 168 (1974).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑