August v. Stasak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania April 13, 1978

August v. Stasak, 253 Pa. Super. 310 (1978)

384 A.2d 1359; 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2776

Cercone, Consideration, Former, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Orders affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ.,

dissent on the ground that the rule of Brakeman v. Potomac Ins. Co., 472 Pa. 66, 371 A.2d 193 (1977) should be applied, as it was applied in Brakeman, to all cases pending on appeal.

WATKINS, former President Judge, and CERCONE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name: Timothy E. AUGUST v. George W. STASAK, Ruth Mary Stasak and John M. Stasak David C. BELZNER v. John STASAK
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published