Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978

In re Holmes

In re Holmes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 13, 1978 · Cercone, Consideration, Former, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins
254 Pa. Super. 118; 385 A.2d 553

In re Holmes

Dissenting Opinion

HOFFMAN, Judge,

dissenting:

Because the record does not contain a probation report on the physical and moral properties of the home and psychiatric reports on the background and current status of each family member, he would remand for a hearing at which these factors will be considered.

WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.