Commonwealth v. Curry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Curry, 254 Pa. Super. 444 (1978)
386 A.2d 32; 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2846
Cercone, Consideration, Former, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins

Commonwealth v. Curry

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCusker, -Pa. - (No. 2850 Allocatur Docket, Filed September 21, 1977). Upon remand the lower court must advise appellant as provided in Rule 1405(c), Pa.R.Crim.P. (added June 29, 1977, effective September 1, 1977); appellant should comply with the procedure set forth in Rule 321, Pa.R.Crim.P. See Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa. Super. -, 388 A.2d 340 (1978) (concurring opinion by SPAETH, J.).

Dissenting Opinion

CERCONE, J.,

dissents on the basis of Commonwealth v. McCusker, No. 2850 Alloc.Dkt., filed September 21, 1977.

Dissenting Opinion

PRICE, J.,

dissents and would affirm the judgment of sentence because the voluntariness of appellant’s failure to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea is not raised.

WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Rufus CURRY
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published