Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978

Commonwealth v. King

Commonwealth v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided July 12, 1978 · Basis, Comments, Consideration, Crim, Dilbeck, Failure, Former, Hoffman, Requirements, Reversal, Spaeth, Watkins, Will
258 Pa. Super. 611; 391 A.2d 688; 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4063

Commonwealth v. King

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed.

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissented on the basis of Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543, 353 A.2d 824, 827 (1976): “The failure to satisfy these minimal requirements [of the Comments to Pa.R.Crim.P. 319(a)] will result in reversal.” WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑