Commonwealth v. Jones
Commonwealth v. Jones
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Maurice Jones was found guilty of criminal trespass
So ordered.
. 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3503(a)(1).
. 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3502(a).
. 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3921(a).
. The record reflects that only the case of the Commonwealth was transcribed for review on appeal despite the request of the appellant that the entire transcript be transcribed and the copies thereof be furnished counsel. We are thus precluded from making a proper review upon the entire record of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction of appellant. Commonwealth v. Smith, 490 Pa. 329, 416 A.2d 494 (1980); See Pa.R.A.P. 1922; Commonwealth v. Anderson, 441 Pa. 483, 272 A.2d 877 (1971) (while a transcript per se is not absolute due process necessity, there must be an equivalent “picture” of what transpired below); Commonwealth v. Bear, 283 Pa.Super. 174, 423 A.2d 1045 (1980)); Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 254 Pa.Super. 454, 386 A.2d 37 (1978); See also Act of May 1, 1907, P.L. 135, § 2, as amended, 17 P.S. § 1802, repealed, act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202, No. 53, § 2(a) [899], effective June 27, 1978.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.