Commonwealth v. Santiago

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Santiago, 306 Pa. Super. 176 (1982)
452 A.2d 272; 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5641
Beck, Lipez, Spaeth

Commonwealth v. Santiago

Opinion of the Court

OPINION PER CURIAM:

On appellant’s petition, No. 416, Philadelphia, 1981, filed after submission of this appeal, and agreed to by the Commonwealth, we remand so that there may be a hearing on post-trial motions based upon after-discovered evidence. This remand is without prejudice to appellant being able to raise, on a future appeal, after the after-discovered evidence issue has been litigated in the lower court, the same issues he has raised on this appeal.

Appellant’s petition for remand is granted and the record on this appeal is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Reference

Full Case Name
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Fidel SANTIAGO
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published