Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982

Commonwealth v. Santiago

Commonwealth v. Santiago
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 5, 1982 · Beck, Lipez, Spaeth
306 Pa. Super. 176; 452 A.2d 272; 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5641

Commonwealth v. Santiago

Opinion of the Court

OPINION PER CURIAM:

On appellant’s petition, No. 416, Philadelphia, 1981, filed after submission of this appeal, and agreed to by the Commonwealth, we remand so that there may be a hearing on post-trial motions based upon after-discovered evidence. This remand is without prejudice to appellant being able to raise, on a future appeal, after the after-discovered evidence issue has been litigated in the lower court, the same issues he has raised on this appeal.

Appellant’s petition for remand is granted and the record on this appeal is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.