Wilson v. Keystone Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Wilson v. Keystone Insurance, 321 Pa. Super. 495 (1983)
468 A.2d 818; 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4492
Johnson, Lipez, Watkins

Wilson v. Keystone Insurance

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue in this appeal is whether basic loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act may be “stacked.” We have held up disposition of this appeal until the issue could be determined by this court en banc, which has now held that basic loss benefits may not be stacked. Antanovich v. Allstate Insurance Company, 320 Pa.Super.Ct. 322, 467 A.2d 345 (1983). Since the court below computed the amounts the insurance company was ordered to pay under the assumption that benefits may be stacked, we must vacate the order and remand with a direction to recompute the benefits in accordance with Antanovich v. Allstate Insurance Company, supra.

Order vacated, and case remanded with instructions. Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gerald Alan WILSON, Administrator, C.T.A. of the Estate of Eleanor D. Wilson, and Louis D. Wilson, as surviving spouse on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other survivors of Eleanor D. Wilson v. KEYSTONE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published