Commonwealth v. Thorpe
Commonwealth v. Thorpe
Opinion of the Court
Today we decided that double jeopardy principles do not bar reprosecution of appellant’s co-defendant on charges arising from the killing of Zollie Perry. Appellant raises the identical issue decided in that case, and we therefore affirm on the basis of Commonwealth v. Simons, 342 Pa.Super. 281, 492 A.2d 1119 (1985).
Order affirmed.
Concurring Opinion
concurring:
I concur for reasons appearing in my concurring opim m in Commonwealth v. Simons, 342 Pa.Super. 281, 492 A.2d 1119 (1985).
Concurring Opinion
concurring:
I concur on the basis of my Concurring Opinion in Commonwealth v. Simons, 342 Pa.Super. 281, 492 A.2d 397 (J. 1927/83, filed May 10, 1985).
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
I dissent for the reasons stated in my Dissenting Opinion in Commonwealth v. Simons, 342 Pa.Super. 281, 492 A.2d 1119 J. E4001/84 (filed May 10, 1985).
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
I dissent for reasons discussed in my Dissenting Opinion in Commonwealth v. Simons, 342 Pa.Super. 281, 492 A.2d 1119 J. E4001/84; filed May 10, 1985).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Wayne THORPE
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published