Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
356 Pa. Super. 454; 514 A.2d 947; 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291
Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
I dissent for the reasons set forth in my Dissenting Opinion in Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).
Opinion of the Court
This matter comes before this Court en banc on appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant asks us to decide whether an uninsured owner-operator may receive uninsured motorist benefits from an assigned claims plan insurer. In a companion case, we answered this question in the negative. We refer appellant to the case of Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.