Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1986

Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 19, 1986 · Beck, Brosky, Cavanaugh, Cirillo, Files, Montemuro, Olszewski, Sole, Tamilia, Wieand
356 Pa. Super. 454; 514 A.2d 947; 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291

Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

Dissenting Opinion

BROSKY, Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my Dissenting Opinion in Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).

Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This matter comes before this Court en banc on appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant asks us to decide whether an uninsured owner-operator may receive uninsured motorist benefits from an assigned claims plan insurer. In a companion case, we answered this question in the negative. We refer appellant to the case of Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).

Order affirmed.

BROSKY, J., files dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.