Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014

Yunik, J. v. Overmyer, M.

Yunik, J. v. Overmyer, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Decided August 26, 2014

Yunik, J. v. Overmyer, M.

Opinion

J-S42027-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 JAY YUNIK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. MICHAEL OVERMYER, Appellee No. 135 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered December 30, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County Criminal Division at No.: CP-20-MD-0000534-2013

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., JENKINS, J., and MUSMANNO, J.

MEMORANDUM BY JENKINS, J. FILED: AUGUST 25, 2014 Jay Yunik appeals from an order denying his habeas corpus motion filed against Michael Overmyer, superintendent of the State Correctional Facility at Forest, where Yunik is presently serving his sentence of 54-180

Having examined the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the Honorable John Spataro of the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County, we

, we adopt his opinion as our own. See Trial Court Opinion (noting that Yunik was sentenced to imprisonment for rape and has filed 4 PCRA petitions, none of which were successful; PCRA subsumes the J-S24029-14

claims Yunik wishes to pursue in his habeas corpus petition, viz., illegal police interrogation, invalid affidavit of probable cause, concealment of exculpatory evidence, illegal arrest, denial of right to counsel at various stages of case, ineffective assistance of counsel, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, unlawfully induced guilty plea, lack of factual basis for guilty

limitations; Yunik fails to plead or prove any exceptions to the one year statute of limitations; Yunik not prejudiced by the absence of a 20 day notice of intent to dismiss his petition under Pa.R.Crim.P. 907, since court entertained his motion for reconsideration after denying his original habeas corpus motion; Yunik waived objection to the absence of a 20 day notice by failing to include this objection in his statement of matters complained of on appeal).

Order affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 8/25/2014

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.