Com. v. Severino, J.
Com. v. Severino, J.
Opinion
J-S42025-14
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. JAMES J. SEVERINO, JR. Appellant No. 1856 WDA 2013
Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 23, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-02-SA-0000925-2013
BEFORE: PANELLA, J., JENKINS, J., and MUSMANNO, J.
DISSENTING STATEMENT BY PANELLA, J. FILED SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 I respectfully disagree with my esteemed colleagues in the Majority
suspension was DUI-related. The Majority notes that the Commonwealth
than admitting into evidence a printout of the JNET records. The Majority ssible hearsay. See
hearsay. However, Appellant never objected to the testimony. In the absence of an objection, the testimony is competent evidence. I would affirm the conviction.
Judge Musmanno and Judge Jenkins do not join in dissenting statement.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.