J-S35022-19

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. ATIBA WICKER Appellant No. 2244 EDA 2018

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered July 10, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at Nos: CP-51-CR-0002843-2012; CP-51-CR-0002844-2012; CP-51-CR-0002845-2012

BEFORE: OLSON, STABILE, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY STABILE, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 Appellant, Atiba Wicker, appeals from the July 10, 2018 order dismissing his petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A.

§§ 9541-9546. We quash.

The record reveals that on November 15, 2011, Appellant was arrested and charged with aggravated assault and related offenses on three separate bills of information for three separate victims. On December 18, 2013, the trial court imposed an aggregate 31 to 72 years of incarceration. This Court affirmed the judgment of sentence on August 13, 2015. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied allowance of appeal on February 1, 2016. Appellant ____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

J-S35022-19

filed a timely first pro se PCRA petition on December 13, 2016. Appointed counsel filed an amended petition on August 11, 2017. The PCRA court conducted several hearings, and eventually denied relief on July 10, 2018.

This timely appeal followed.

As noted, this case proceeded against Appellant at three separate dockets. Appellant, however, has filed a single notice of appeal. In Commonwealth v. Walker, 185 A.3d 969, 977 (Pa. 2018), our Supreme Court held, prospectively, that “when a single order resolves issues arising on more than one lower court docket, separate notices of appeal must be filed.”

Failure to comply requires quashal of the appeal. Id. This Court has applied Walker to cases pending on collateral review. Commonwealth v. Nichols, 208 A.3d 1087 (Pa. Super. 2019). Walker, decided on June 1, 2018, predated the appeal in this case. We are therefore constrained to quash this appeal.

Appeal quashed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 9/24/19

-2-