J-S63012-19

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PENNSYLVANIA, : OF PENNSYLVANIA : Appellee : : v. : : DARRYL (DEWS) WEST, : : Appellant : No. 743 EDA 2019

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered February 5, 2019 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001366-2012 CP-51-CR-0001772-2012 CP-51-CR-0014064-2011

COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PENNSYLVANIA, : OF PENNSYLVANIA : Appellee : : v. : : DARRYL DEWS, : : Appellant : No. 744 EDA 2019

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered February 5, 2019 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001366-2012 CP-51-CR-0001772-2012 CP-51-CR-0014064-2011 J-S63012-19

COMMONWEALTH OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PENNSYLVANIA, : OF PENNSYLVANIA : Appellee : : v. : : DARRYL DEWS, : : Appellant : No. 745 EDA 2019

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered February 5, 2019 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0001366-2012 CP-51-CR-0001772-2012 CP-51-CR-0014064-2011 BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J.E., MURRAY, J. and STRASSBURGER, J.* DISSENTING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED JANUARY 16, 2020 I respectfully dissent because I would hold disposition of the instant appeal until after this Court’s en banc review of the following appeals, Commonwealth v. Rebecca Johnson, 2063 EDA 2018; Commonwealth v. Ron Larkin, 2761 EDA 2018; and Commonwealth v. Jerome Johnson, 1620 EDA 2018; 2045 EDA 2018; 2046 EDA 2018; and 2047 EDA 2018. On October 4, 2019, this Court ordered that the aforementioned appeals be listed before the next available en banc panel. The primary issues are whether (1) Appellant’s inclusion of multiple court of common pleas docket numbers on his or her notices of appeal violates Pa.R.A.P. 341 and Commonwealth v.

____________________________________________ * Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

-2- J-S63012-19

Walker, 185 A.3d 969 (Pa. 2018); and (2) if so, whether such violation necessitates quashal by this Court. Because these issues are precisely before us in the instant appeal, I would wait until disposition of the en banc cases before ruling on Appellant’s appeal.

-3-