J-S23020-24

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : TERRILL MATOX : : Appellant : No. 2657 EDA 2023 Appeal from the Order Entered October 23, 2023 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-46-CR-0005113-2020 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : TERRILL MATOX : : Appellant : No. 2658 EDA 2023 Appeal from the Order Entered October 23, 2023 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-46-CR-0003980-2021

BEFORE: STABILE, J., KING, J., and COLINS, J.* JUDGMENT ORDER BY KING, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 16, 2024 Appellant, Terrill Matox,1 appeals from the order entered in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), at 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541- ____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

J-S23020-24

9546. We affirm.

The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows. On July 14, 2022, Appellant entered negotiated guilty pleas at the above- captioned docket numbers. Specifically, at docket No. 5113-2020, Appellant pled guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver (“PWID”), in exchange for a sentence of 11½ to 23 months of incarceration.2 At docket No. 3980-2021, Appellant pled guilty to one count of PWID, in exchange for a sentence of 11½ to 23 months of incarceration, 3 to run concurrent with his sentence at No. 5113-2020. The court accepted Appellant’s negotiated guilty pleas and imposed the agreed-upon sentences that day. Appellant did not file a post-sentence motion or direct appeal.

On June 13, 2023, Appellant filed a timely pro se PCRA petition at both underlying dockets. On August 15, 2023, appointed counsel filed a Turner/Finley4 no-merit letter and motion to withdraw. On September 11, 2023, the PCRA court sent Appellant notice of its intent to dismiss the petition without a hearing pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 907.

On October 3, 2023, prior to the formal denial of PCRA relief, Appellant filed premature notices of appeal at each underlying docket. On October 23,

____________________________________________

-2- J-S23020-24

2023, the PCRA court formally denied PCRA relief. 5 The PCRA court did not order, and Appellant did not file, a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) concise statement of errors on appeal.

As a preliminary matter, we observe that a PCRA petitioner must be currently serving a sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for the conviction at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief. 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9543(a)(1)(i).

A petitioner who has completed his sentence is no longer eligible for post- conviction relief. Commonwealth v. Soto, 983 A.2d 212, 213 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 610 Pa. 577, 17 A.3d 1253 (2011).

Instantly, the court sentenced Appellant on July 14, 2022, to concurrent terms of 11½ to 23 months’ imprisonment, with credit for time served. Thus, the record indicates that Appellant has already finished serving his maximum sentence for these crimes.6 Because Appellant’s sentences have expired, he is not eligible for relief under the PCRA. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9543(a)(1)(i); Soto, supra. Accordingly, we affirm.

Order affirmed.

____________________________________________

-3- J-S23020-24

Date: 9/16/2024

-4-