Vranesevich Estate
Opinion of the Court
This estate is before us for settlement on petition pursuant to section 3102 of the Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries Code of June 30, 1972, P.L. 508 (No. 164), 20 Pa.C.S. §3102. The dispute is between decedent’s mother (claimant), who claims reimbursement for payment of the funeral bill, and decedent’s widow and two sons, who are his intestate heirs. We have concluded that the mother’s claim must be denied.
It is fundamental that a decedent’s funeral expenses are not, strictly speaking, a debt. On the contrary, such expenses are a charge which are imposed by the law, out of decency, on decedent’s estate. As a result, therefore, such charges must be reasonable in amount and must not be disproportionate to the size of the estate. Only such an amount as bears a fair and just ratio to the size of decedent’s estate and his status in life will be allowed: Sobolak Estate, 21 Beaver 195, 10 Fiduc. Rep. 161 (1960). Also see Ennis’s Estate, 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 292 (1921); Zappardino Estate, 33 D. & C. 2d 117 (1964); Steen Estate, 11 Fiduc. Rep. 330 (1961), Nowacki Estate, 9 Fiduc. Rep. 517 (1959), and Caruso Estate, 72 D. & C. 411 (1949).
Obviously, the funeral expenses which axe very nearly 100 percent of decedent’s gross estate, are far from reasonable. While we need not decide precisely what amount is reasonable, under these circumstances, we also are of the opinion that the amount of $900 for funeral expenses would be more than reasonable in this estate. Such an amount is approximately 30 percent of decedent’s gross estate and claimant’s contention would consume the en
In addition, while we recognize that the beneficiary of decedent’s fife insurance policy cannot be required to use the proceeds thereof for payment of the funeral expenses,
For all of these reasons, we make the following
DECREE
Now, October 16, 1975, the claim of Anna Miokovic for reimbursement of decedent’s funeral expenses paid by her is denied. It is further ordered and directed that the Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation pay the wages due decedent, in the amount of $3,165.50 to his widow, Mary Lou Vranesevich. If no exceptions are filed within ten days, this decree shall become final.
. The record discloses that at the time of his death, decedent was in arrears under a support order for the support of his wife and children.
. In re Goe’s Estate, 19 Beaver 73 (1957).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.