Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1882

Wareham v. Hummel

Wareham v. Hummel
Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas · Decided May 31, 1882 · Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Sitarswood, Sterrett, Trunkey
3 Pennyp. 157

Counsel

Wallace Be Witt for plaintiff in error,, J. O. MoAlarney for defendant in error presented no paper-book.

Wareham v. Hummel

Opinion of the Court

— Per Curiam :

The law of this case was clearly stated and explained to the jury in a very lucid charge by the learned Judge, and the facts were fairly submitted. It was earnestly contended that there was a duty incumbent on Hummel when he paid the mortgage to see that it was satisfied of record. The jury have found that it was not assigned by Hummel’s direction. We think the charge, as complained of in the fourth assignment, was entirely right and it disposes of the whole case.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.