Nolan v. Smythe
Opinion of the Court
— This matter is before us on a motion to strike off an appeal from a judgment entered for plaintiff by Alderman George J. Brabender
In Dougherty v. Greggs, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 166, cited by plaintiff as authority for his contention that the bond is inadequate, defendant gave bond for costs to accrue only, and did not pay the costs already incurred. Here appellant did what was within his power to take an appeal under the Act of March 20, 1845, P. L. 188, 42 PS §921. The error in preparing a correct transcript was that of the alderman, but appellant’s appeal procedure was proper.
The second reason given is that the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, which executed the bail bond as surety, is not approved and properly qualified to act in that capacity. Downing v. Erie City School District et al., 360 Pa. 29, holds, in effect, that an insurance company may enter into a binding contract irrespective of the law of this State relative to supervision by the Insurance Commissioner. However, we do not believe that our acts of assembly, passed for the purpose of protecting our citizens through the office of the Insurance Commissioner, can be ignored. The Ohio insurance company may be a company organized and authorized for the purpose of becoming surety on bonds, but it is not qualified to do business in this State, which requires a certificate of qualification to be filed in the prothonotary’s office. This defect in the record, however, we feel can be corrected nunc pro tunc. In view of the steps necessary to effect a proper appeal, we of our own motion will strike off the entry of a non pros, for want of an appearance and complaint, filed May 25, 1949.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.