Marley v. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. (In re Marley)
Marley v. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. (In re Marley)
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We are confronted by the constitutional issue of whether a judicial lien which arose prior to the enactment date of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) may be avoided by the debtors pursuant to § 522(f) of the Code. We conclude that § 522(f) is constitutional as applied to the lien herein and the debtors may, therefore, avoid it pursuant to that section.
The facts of the instant case are as follows:
On October 16, 1980, the debtors filed a petition for relief under chapter 7 of the Code and claimed as exempt under § 522(d)(1)
We conclude that the instant case is governed by our decision in In re Paden, 10 B.R. 206 (Bkrtcy. E.D. Pa. 1981) in which we held that § 522(f) did apply to liens created prior to the enactment date of the Code and that as so applied that section was constitutional. Consequently, we will grant the debtors the relief requested in their complaint and order that the lien of IVB is avoided.
. This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 752 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
. Section 522(d)(1) permits a debtor to exempt up to $7,500 of his interest in real property. Section 522(m) entitles each debtor in a joint case to his exemptions under that section.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re David MARLEY, a/k/a, David Marley, Jr. and Carol Marley, Debtors. David MARLEY, a/k/a, David Marley, Jr. and Carol Marley v. INDUSTRIAL VALLEY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
- Status
- Published