MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Stephan Schmidheiny brought this action alleging violation of the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1129. Presently before the court are the parties renewed cross motions for summary judgment predicated upon a joint stipulation of undisputed facts. For the reasons which follow, we enter judgment in favor of the Schmidheiny.

The joint stipulation establishes the following facts:

1. Plaintiff Stephan Schmidheiny (Mr. Schmidheiny) is a living individual.

2. Mr. Schmidheiny has been ranked among the wealthiest individuals in the world by Forbes magazine for the past three years. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 1 at p. 114; Exh. 2 at p. 263; Exh. 3 at p. 228)

3. The Internet domain name <schmi-dheiny.com > includes the Schmidheiny surname.

4. Mr. Schmidheiny did not consent to the defendants registration of the domain name < schmidheiny.com >. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 11 at & 1)

5. Mr. Weber has registered or otherwise acquired Internet domain names listing Domainsale and Weber Technologies as the registrants. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 13)

6. Famology.com, Inc. was incorporated in April 2000. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 32)

*615 7. Mr. Weber is the President and Treasurer of Famology.com, Inc. (McDo-nell Decl., Exh. 32)

8. Mr. Weber is currently listed as the administrative and technical contact for Famology.com, Inc. for the <schmi-dheiny.com> domain name. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 7)

9. One or both of the defendants sold or transferred the domain name <silver-man.com > to a third party in return for a payment of $8,500. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 12)

10. One or both of the defendants sold or transferred the domain name <mur-dock.com > to a third party in return for a payment of $9,500. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 12)

11. One or both of the defendants sold or transferred the domain name <gould.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 12)

12. In 2000, one or both of the defendants offered the domain name <mor-an.com> for sale for $50,000 through <virtualestate.com>, a website controlled by one or both of the defendants. (McDo-nell Reply Decl., Exh. 2; Exh. 3) That <virtualestate.eom> website states that “The following Domain Names are for sale,” including <moran.com>. (McDonell Reply Decl., Exh. 2 at § 00036) The domain name <moran.com> includes a word that is a surname. (See Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment at p. 3 ¶ ¶ 4, 7)

13. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain name <pritz-ker.com>. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

14. Jay Robert Pritzker and Thomas Pritzker have been ranked among the world’s wealthiest individuals by Forbes magazine. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 1 at p. 112)

15. On or about October 14, 1999, Mr. Weber received a protest letter from counsel for Jay Robert Pritzker based on the registration of the domain name <pritz-ker.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 19)

16. One or both of the defendants sold or transferred the domain name <pritz-ker.com > to a third party. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 12)

17. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain name <kohl-berg.com >. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

18. Jerome Spiegel Kohlberg, Jr. has been ranked among the world’s wealthiest individuals by Forbes magazine. (McDo-nell Deck, Exh. 1 at p. 124)

19. In May 2000, Mr. Weber was paid $3,000 by Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C. in exchange for the transfer of <kohl-berg.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 15)

20. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain name <whoo-pi.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

21. One or both of the defendants was paid $9,000 by the entertainer Whoopi Goldberg or her representative or affiliated company in return for the domain name <whoopi.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 12)

22. The Declaration of Marc Reiner in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, which was filed under seal, attaches as Exhibit 1 documentation of a payment received by one or both of the defendants in exchange for a domain name that includes an individual’s surname.

23. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain names <princess-di.net>, <princess-di.com>, cladydia-na.net>, <ladydiana.org>, <ladydi.net>, <lady-di.com>, and <lady-diana.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10; Exh. 12)

24. One or both of the defendants sold the domain names <ladydiana.org>, <lady-di.com>, and <lady-diana.com> for $500 each. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 12)

*616 25. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain names cmothert-eresa.com>, <motherteresa.net>, <mot-herteresa.org>, <mother-teresa.com>, <mother-teresa.org>, and <mother-tere-sa.net>. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

26. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain names <sultanof-brunei.com>, <sultanofbrunei.net>, <sul-tanbrunei.com>, and <hmsultanofbru-nei.com >. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

27. One or both of defendants has registered the domain name crossper-ot.com >. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

28. Ross Perot’s company, Perot Systems Corporation, brought an arbitration proceeding against Domainsale. (McDo-nell Decl., Exh. 13)

29. The arbitrator in that proceeding found that Mr. Weber registered or acquired the domain name <rossperot.com> primarily for the purpose of selling, renting or otherwise transferring the domain name for valuable consideration in excess of his out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 11 at Response to Request to Admit No. 19)

30. The domain name crossper-ot.com > was transferred to Perot Systems Corporation as a result of the arbitration. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

31. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain names <jaguar.com> and <jag.com>. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 12)

32. In Jaguar Cars Ltd. et al. v. Steven Weber, Civil Action No. 98-70623, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, one or both of the defendants was sued based on the domain names <jaguar.eom> and <jag.com>. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 14 at § 00083)

33. One or both of the defendants transferred the domain names <jag-

uar.com> and <jag.com> to Jaguar Cars Ltd. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

34. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain name <frankli-nmint.com >. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

35. In Franklin Mint Company v. Steven Weber, Civil Action No. 98-CV-3011, suit was brought against one or both of the defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by the Franklin Mint Company over the use of the domain name cfrankli-nmint.com >. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 14 at § 00083-84)

36. One or both of the defendants transferred the domain name <frankli-nmint.com > to Franklin Mint Company. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 10)

37. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain name <clar-idge.com >. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

38. In The Claridge At Park Plaza, Inc. v. Steven Weber, Civil Action No. 98-CV-3757, suit was brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by The Claridge At Park Plaza, Inc. arising out of the registration by one or both of the defendants of the domain name <claridge.eom>. (McDo-nell Deck, Exh. 14 at § 00084)

39. One or both of the defendants transferred the domain name <clar-idge.com> to the Claridge Casino & Hotel. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

40. One or both of the defendants has registered the domain name <sadd.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

41. SADD, Inc. brought an arbitration against the registration of <sadd.com> by one or both of the defendants and the arbitrator ruled in favor of SADD, Inc. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 14)

42. One or both of the defendants transferred the domain name <sadd.com> to SADD, Inc. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 10)

*617 43. When registering a domain name, an individual the registrant enters into a contractual agreement with a registrar. (Network Solutions, Inc. v. Umbro, Inti. Inc., 259 Va.759, 529 S.E.2d 80, 86 (2000))

44. As part of that contractual agreement, the registrar agrees to allow the registrant the exclusive use of a specific domain name for a certain period of time. (Network Solutions, Inc. v. Umbro, Inti Inc., 259 Va.759, 529 S.E.2d 80, 86 (2000))

45. In exchange for the right to use the domain name for a fixed period, the registrant pays a certain sum of money and agrees to certain other conditions, which vary depending upon the registrar involved. (McDonell Decl., Exhs. 21, 23)

46. In March 2000, the named registrant for < schmidheiny.com > was “Weber Net” and the registrar was Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI). (McDonell Deck, Exh. 6)

47. In June 2000, the domain name <schmidheiny.com> was transferred from NSI, a U.S. domain name registrar, to a new registrar, Internet Names Worldwide (“INWW”), a division of Melbourne IT Ltd. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 19)

48. The named registrant for <schmi-dheiny.com> was changed in or after June 2000 to defendant Famology.com, Inc. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 9 at Response to Interrog. No. 5)

49. Defendant Famology.com, Inc. and Weber Net are not the same entity. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 11 at ¶ 11)

50. One or both of the defendants paid a fee and entered into a contract — a “Registration agreement” with INWW. (McDo-nell Decl., Exh. 23 at § 00146)

51. In exchange for paying a fee and entering into the Registration agreement, one or both of the defendants was permitted to transfer the < schmidheiny.com > domain name to INWW and to reserve the <schmidheiny.com> domain name for an additional year past its original February 2001 expiration date. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 23 at § 00146)

52. After the <schmidheiny.com> domain name was transferred to INWW, the new expiration date for <schmi-dheiny.com> became February 28, 2002. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 29)

53. On or around May 24, 2001, one or both of the defendants paid INWW a fee to reserve to Famology.com, Inc. the exclusive use of the < schmidheiny.com > domain name for an additional one-year period. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 28)

54. On the INWW website, INWW provides information about the registrant of domain names that are registered through INWW. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 7)

55. As of July 25, 2001, on the INWW website, INWW listed the “Registration Date” of <schmidheiny.com> as June 22, 2000. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 7)

56. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of NSI’s “Registrant Name Change Agreement,” the New Registrant enters into an agreement “for the registration” of the domain name and the effective date of that “registration” is the date of NSI’s transmission of an acknowledgment to the New Registrant. (McDonell Decl., Exh. 22, at § 00117)

57. On the DirectNic website, the registrar gives instructions for transferring domain names to DirectNic from another registrar. As part of those instructions, the DirectNic website states: “At this time, your transferred domains can only be registered for one year. At the time of renewal you can change the number of years you have your domains registered.” (See http://www.directnic.com/help/faq/in-dex. php?questioned=72 & topic-id =5)

58. In November 2000, Mr. Weber sent an email with the following text to Ms. *618 Evelyn Braun, Mr. Schmidheiny’s assistant:

Hello,

I am sending this email to those who have shown an interest in the purchase of the Schmidheiny.com Domain Name. I recently received an offer of $1,000,000 for this domain name. I don’t know why those people want this name or why they made such an elaborate offer but I certainly plan on accepting this offer regardless of their intent. I told them once the name was not for sale and they then made this offer. I believe that they are sincere though I have no idea why they want the name so badly. But for $1,000,000, I am not going to question their motives!

I figured I owened [sic ] it to myself and to those who were interested in the name to allow you an opportunity to better this offer. I have no intentions on [sic] involving anyone in a bidding war. The people who made this offer clearly stated that their offer price was firm. Therefore, if anyone is willing and/or able to make an offer of $1.1 million I will certainly sell to you instead. If anyone is interested, please reply as soon as possible. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Steve Weber

(215) 513-1788

(McDonell Deck, Exh. 25; Exh. 11 at ¶ 2)

59. Defendants did not produce in discovery a copy of the $1,000,000 offer referenced in Mr. Weber’s e-mail to Ms. Braun.

60. Mr. Weber uses the Afternic.com domain name auction website under the username “santa.” (McDonell Deck, Exh. 11 at ¶ 18)

61. On or about November 28, 2000, the < schmidheiny.com > domain name was listed on the Afternic.com website with the “seller” designated as “santa” and the “minimum offer” designated as $1,100,000. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 26)

62. According to the Afternic.com User Agreement, when a registrant lists a domain name for auction or sale he or she makes “a binding offer for sale that cannot be withdrawn.” (McDonell Reply Deck, Exh. 1 at ¶ 12)

63. One or both of the defendants would have achieved a profit if he/it sold the < schmidheiny.com > domain name for $1 million or more. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 12 at Response to Interrog. No. 10)

64. Defendants did not produce any evidence in discovery that anyone with the Schmidheiny name has actually used any services that defendants provide at <schmidheiny.com>. (McDonell Deck, Exh. 9 at Response to Interrog. No. 8)

65. The Yahoo! search database of telephone directories contains no entries in the United States for the surname “Schmi-dheiny.” (McDonell Deck, Exh. 5 at § 00149)

66. Armand Christopher has registered the domain names < cybersquatters.com > and <cyberbullies.com> and operated websites connected with those domain names. (McDonell Reply Deck, Exhs. 5-8) On the top of each of those websites is the heading “CYBERSQUATTERS.COM” and the text “PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS!” (McDonell Deck, Exhs. 7, 8)

67. One or both of the defendants has registered the following domain names. These domain names are identical to the surnames of individuals who have been ranked among the world’ wealthiest individuals by Forbes magazine. The individuals on the Forbes list are indicated next to the domain names below.

*619 Domain Name Individual

<adelson.com> Sheldon Adelson

< alhariri.com >/< al-hariri.com > Rafik Al-Hariri

<alkharafi.com>/<al-kharafi.com> Nassir AI-Kharafi

<aramburuzabala.com> Maria Aramburuzabala

< arnault.com> Bernard Arnault

< arrillaga.com > John Arrillaga

<bailleres.org> Alberto Bailleres

<beisheim.com> Otto Beisheim

<busuiima.com> Kunio Busuiima

<dedman.com> Robert Henry Dedman

<fentener> John A. Fentener van Vlissingen

<frist.com> Thomas F. Frist, Jr.

< gonda.com > Louis Gonda and Leslie Gonda

<haefner.com> Walter Haefner

<haub.com> Erivan Haub

<hopp.com> Dietmar Hopp

<itoyama.com> Eitaro Itoyama

<.iannard.com> Jim Jannard

<kamprad.com> Ingvar Kamprad

<kerkorian.com> Kirk Kerkorian

<khosla.org> Vinad Khosla

<koplowitz.com> Alicia Koplowitz and Esther Koplowitz

<kovner.net>/<kovner.org> Bruce Kovner

<kriens.org> Scott Kriens

<kristiansen.com> Kield Kirk Kristiansen

<kroenke.eom> Ann Walton Kroenke

<kudelski.org> Andre KudelsM

< kuok.com > Robert Kuok

< kwek.com > Leng Beng Kwek

<luksie.eom> Andronico Luksic

<mathile.com> Clayton L. Mathile

<mercMe.net> Adolf MercMe

<murdoek.eom> David Howard Murdock

< naify.com > Robert Allen Naify

<nambu.com> YasuyuM Nambu

< omidyar.com > Pierre M. Omidyar

<pinault.com> Francois Pinault

<potanin.com> Vladimir Potanin

<rales.com> Mitchell Rales and Steven Rales

<sahenk.com> Ferit Sahenk

<samueli.com> Henry Samueli

<schmidheiny.com> Stephan Schmidheiny

<schoerghuber.com> Stefan Schoerghuber

<skoll.com> Jeff Skoll

<sobrato.net> John Albert Sobrato

<takdzaM.com> Takernitsu TaMzaM

<tschira.eom> Klaus Tsehira

< tsutsumi.com > YoshiaM Tsutsumi

*620 <ueltschi.com> Albert Lee Ueltschi

<van-beuren.com> Hope Hill Van Beuren

<vonfinck.com> August von Finek

< von-holtzbrinck.com > Dieter von Holtzbrinck

<waitt.com> Theodore Waitt and Norman Waitt

< winnick.com > Gary Winnick

68. Defendants have no connection with any of the individuals listed above who have been ranked among the world’ wealthiest individuals by Forbes magazine, including Mr. Schmidheiny.

69. The domain name schmidheiny.com was first registered on February 28, 1999, before the enactment of 15 USC 1129.

70. The only registrar of dot com domain names that existed at the time 15 USC 1129 was passed was Network Solutions Inc.

71. Plaintiff made no offer to purchase the domain name schmidheiny.com before he filed the instant case.

72. There are towns in Kansas, Michigan, Texas, and Wyoming named Moran.

73. On or about June 15, 2000, Weber received an email message from Evelyn Braun stating, in part, “Stephan Schmi-dheiny would be interested in the domain name schmidheiny.com .... ”

74. Weber contacted Ms. Braun and indicated that the name was “not available for transfer.”

75. There are about 95 individuals with the surname Schmidheiny in Switzerland.

76. The following domain names are owned by Plaintiff, or his brother, or one of their companies: schmi-dheiny.net, schmidheiny.org, stephan-schmidheiny.com, stephan-sehmi-dheiny.net, stephan-schmidheiny.com, ste-phanschmidheiny.com, stephanschmi-dheiny.net, stephanschmidheiny.org, th-schmidheiny.com, th-schmidheiny.net, th-schmidheiny.org, thomas-schmi-dheiny.com, thomas-schmidheiny.net, thomas-schmidheiny.org, thomasschmi-dheiny.com, thomasschmidheiny.net, tho-masschmidheiny.org, thschmidheiny.com, thschmidheiny.net, thschmidheiny.org.

77. Weber has registered hundreds of domain names which primarily fall into four different categories. Names of famous individuals such as Ross Perot. Generic words such as back.com, gymnasium.com, hypnotists.com, jets.com and others. Weber also registered hundreds of surnames including Gould.com, Smith, ly, Moran.com and numerous geographic descriptions.

78. Weber does not own weber.com.

79. Famology.com, Inc. currently offers web based email services using hundreds of different domain names which incorporate surnames. Anyone on the planet can obtain a free email address at schmidheiny.com through Famology.com Inc.

80. The Famology.com website currently provides links to genealogy web sites, links to family oriented web sites, a free message posting service, and a free email reminder service.

81. Weber currently operates a website about Mother Teresa at http://www.mot-herteresa.com/.

82. Weber donated four Princess Diana domain names he owned to the Diana Foundation.

83. The website Netldentity.com (formerly MailBank.com) holds over 15,000 surname domain names, and uses them to provide email services.

84. Charlotte Weber is on the Forbes list of wealthiest individuals but Steven *621 Weber is not. Their last names are identical.

85. Famology.com Inc owns the following domain names which do not represent individuals on the Forbes list of wealthiest individuals:

8DWORLDS.COM

3H.COM

ABDUL.NET

ABDUL.ORG

ABODEOFPEACE.COM

ACUPUNCTURISTS.COM

ADAMS.WS

AGORDO.ORG

ALBRIGHTSVILLE.COM

ALDERFER.COM

ALESSANDRINI.ORG

AL-MASRI.COM

ALMASRI.NET

AL-MASRI.NET

ALMUHTADEEBILLAH.COM

AMERICANJOURNAL.COM

AMERICAN-JOURNAL.COM

ANTIPOLO.COM

ARCORE.ORG

ARDILA.COM

ARMAGH.COM

AUCTIONCHAT.NET

BACK.COM

BADHOMBURG.ORG

BAINUM.COM

BAKRIE.COM

BAL-HARBOR.NET

BAL-HARBOR.ORG

BANDARSERIBEGAWAN.COM

BANGAR.COM

BARNDT.COM

BARRINGTON-HILLS.COM

BARRINGTONHILLS.NET

BARRINGTONHILLS.ORG

BAZELON.COM

BELAIT.COM

BENALIA.COM

BENTONVILLE.ORG

BERAKAS.COM

BIDIS.COM

BILLCOSBY.COM

BILL-COSBY.COM

BILLUND.ORG

BLOOMFIELD-HILLS.ORG

BOLER.COM

BONNE.COM

BOUDJAKDJI.COM

BRAINTEASERS.COM

BREAST-CANCER.COM

BREAST-CANCER.ORG

BRENNINKMEYER.COM

BRITISHCOLUMBIA.ORG

BRITISH-COLUMBIA.ORG

BRUMAIL.COM

BRUNEII.COM

BRUNEIAN.COM

BRUNEIAN.NET

BRUNEIAN.ORG

BRUNEIANS.COM

BRUNEIANS.NET

BRUNEIANS.ORG

BRUNEIDARUSSALAM.COM

BRUNEIDARUSSALAM.NET

BRUNEIDARUSSALAM.ORG

BRUNEIINTERNET.COM

BRUSEARCH.COM

CAMDENCOUNTY.COM

CARELL.COM

CARSEY.COM

CARTER.WS

CASCINA.COM

CASKET.COM

CATHOLICS.NET

CATHOLICS.ORG

CHANUKAH.NET

CHANUKAH.ORG

CHARLIZE.COM

CHERNICK.COM

CHOWDRY.NET

*622 CHOWDRY.ORG

CLEANSERS.COM

CODESIGNS.COM

CONSENT.ORG

CROSSMANN.COM

CR0WN-P0INT.NET

CROWN-POINT.ORG

CUCME.COM

CYBERLADY.COM

DABBIERE.COM

DADE.COM

DADECOUNTY.COM

DADE-COUNTY.COM

DAKOTA-DUNES.COM

DAKOTADUNES.NET

DAKOTADUNES.ORG

DAWSONCREEK.COM

DAWSON-CREEK.COM

DEBROE.COM

DEFFOREY.COM

DELASKI.COM

DEMOULAS.COM

DENEME.COM

DENOBLE.ORG

DETERS.COM

DEUTSCHE.NET

DEUTSCHE.ORG

DEXMIER.COM

DKMB.COM

DOLPHINS.COM

D0MAINS4SALE.NET

DOMAINSALE.COM

DOMAINWANTEDADS.COM

DOMMERMUTH.COM

DONSKY.COM

DOWNTOWNER.COM

DRESHER.COM

DUCHOSSOIS.COM

DUMPED.COM

EAFE.COM

EASTER.NET

EAU-CLAIRE.ORG

EBBERS.COM

ELKFORD.COM

ENB.COM

ENB.NET

ENB.ORG

E-NEWS.COM

ENTERTAINMENT.CC

ENVESTMENT.COM

ENVESTMENTS.COM

ENVESTOR.COM

ENVESTORS.COM

E-VESTING.COM

EVESTMENT.COM

E-VESTMENT.COM

EVESTMENTS.COM

E-VESTMENTS.COM

EVESTOR.COM

E-VESTOR.COM

FAHIM.COM

FAMILYAFFAIR.COM

FAMOLOGY.COM

FAMOLOGY.NET

FAMOLOGY.ORG

FATHERKNOWSBEST.COM

FIRESTEIN.COM

FLB.COM

GADONG.COM

GARCIA.WS

GARIS.COM

GLICKSON.COM

GMAONLINE.COM

GOIZUETA.COM

GOKONGWEI.COM

GOLDSCHMEDING.COM

GOSSIP.NET

GRAZER.COM

GREENWOOD-VILLAGE.COM

GROSSEPOINTESHORES.NET

GWYNEDD.COM

GYMNASIUM.COM

GYMNASIUMS.COM

HAEBLER.COM

HAIFU.COM

*623 HALEWOOD.COM

HAMADAYAMA.ORG

HANIEL.COM

HANUKKAH.ORG

HASCOE.COM

HASSANAL.COM

HASSANALBOLKIAH.COM

HASSANAL-BOLKIAH.COM

HETG00I.NET

HETGOOI.ORG

HHH.COM

HISROYALHIGHNESS.COM

HMSULTAN.COM

HMSULTANOFBRUNEI.COM

HNEWS.COM

HOME-VIDEOS.COM

H0NICKMAN.NET

HONICKMAN.ORG

HORSEHEAD.COM

HUBB.COM

HUSSEIN.ORG

HYPNOTISTS.COM

IBM

IBS.NET

ILITCH.COM

INEWS.COM

I-NEWS.COM

INEWSXCHNAGE.COM

INVERMERE.COM

ISTANANURULIMAN.COM

ITAIL.COM

JABATAN.COM

JERMOLUK.COM

JERUSALEM.NET

JETS.COM

JFKJR.NET

JFKJUNIOR.COM

J-J.COM

JOAN.COM

JUST5.COM

KAPHAN.COM

KARMANOS.COM

KATZENBERG.COM

KERRISDALE.COM

KIDCO.ORG

KIDRO.COM

KITIMAT.COM

K-K.COM

KLAMATH-FALLS.NET

KLAMATH-FALLS.ORG

KOMANSKY.COM

KOSHLAND.COM

KRAUZE.COM

KRETEKS.COM

KUNZELSAU.COM

KUNZELSAU.NET

KUNZELSAU.ORG

KUSHMAN.COM

LAHAINER.COM

LAWE.COM

LAWSOCIETY.COM

LEEKS.COM

LEPRINO.COM

LESLEY.COM

LEWIS.WS

LIEM.COM

LIEMANDT.COM

LIMBANG.COM

LITWIN.COM

LIVE.CC

LIVEINTERNET.COM

LIVEWWW.COM

LNEWS.COM

LOANANDHELP.COM

LOANESCORT.COM

LOANSPELL.COM

LUMBY.COM

MACARTHURPARK.COM

MACARTHUR-PARK.COM

MACRI.COM

MAGERKO.COM

MAKHTOUM.COM

MALAWIAN.COM

MANDM.COM

MANOOGIAN.COM

*624 MARLETTE.COM

MARPOLE.COM

MARTIN.WS

MARWICK.COM

MASENO.COM

MASHOUF.COM

MAUNA.COM

MCVANEY.ORG

MEEGO.COM

MEGGEN.NET

MEGGEN.ORG

MEGSI.COM

MELROSE-PARK.COM

MERCERISLAND.NET

MERCER-ISLAND.ORG

METRODADE.COM

MEXICOCITY.ORG

MIDLANTIC.COM

MIDLANTIC.COM

MILLINGTON.COM

MNM.COM

M0HAMMAD.NET

MOHAMMAD.ORG

MOLEY.COM

M0MC0.C0M

M0RANS.NET

MORRILTON.ORG

MOTHERTERESA.COM

MOTHER-TERESA.COM

MOTHERTERESA.NET

MOTHER-TERESA.NET

MOTHERTERESA.ORG

MOTHER-TERESA.ORG

M0UNTKISC0.NET

M0UNT-KISC0.NET

MUHTADEE.COM

MUHTADEEBILLAH.COM

MUHTADEE-BILLAH.COM

NADING.COM

NAHYAN.COM

NANNY-CAM.COM

NEGARABRUNEIDARUSSA-

LAM.COM

NEILSON.WS

NETLINGS.COM

NEW-ALBANY.NET

NEW-ALBANY.ORG

NEWTON-CENTRE.COM

NEWTONCENTRE.NET

NEWTONCENTRE.ORG

NEWWESTMINSTER.COM

NEW-WESTMINSTER.COM

NIGHAM.COM

NORTHERNVIRGINIA.COM

NORTHVIRGINIA.COM

NORWEGIANS.COM

NOTOVIOLENCE.COM

NTV.COM

NTW.COM

NTW.ORG

NURMBERG.COM

NURMBERG.NET

NURMBERG.ORG

NVERGINIA.COM

NYCITY.ORG

NY-NY.NET

NYNY.ORG

OMAIZA.COM

OMAIZA.NET

OMAIZA.ORG

ONB.COM

OPPERMAN.COM

OSANO.COM

OSHIMA.COM

OWINGS-MILLS.COM

OWINGSMILLS.ORG

OYSTER-BAY.NET

OYSTER-BAY.ORG

PADIAN.COM

PARENTGARTEN.COM

PCCC.COM

PERENCHIO.COM

PERUNDING.COM

PETAR.COM

PETSURF.NET

*625 PIECH.COM

PINEAPPLEISLAND.COM

PLASTIC101.COM

PORTOLA-VALLEY.COM

PRESLEY.ORG

PRINCEJEFRLCOM

PRINCEOFWALES.COM

PRINCESS-DI.COM

PRINCESSDI.NET

PRIT.COM

PRITZ.COM

PRITZ.COM

QANDQ.COM

Q-Q.COM

QUADRACCI.COM

RAMAPHOSA.COM

RASHMAN.COM

READYWEAR.COM

RESERVES.COM

RNR.COM

ROBINSIN.WS

RODRIGUEZ.WS

ROKKE.COM

ROSKI.COM

ROTHAUG.COM

RYSZARD.COM

SABLI.COM

SADULPUR.NET

SADULPUR.ORG

SAINTMARYSPOINT.COM

SANDB.COM

SANDSTONE.COM

SAN-MATEO.ORG

SAVINGSNLOAN.COM

SCANNERS.NET

SCIFRES.NET

SCIFRES.ORG

SEAGAMES.ORG

SEMAUN.COM

SENGKURONG.COM

SERICEL.COM

SERICELS.COM

SEYDOUX.COM

SHAREWAREFIND.COM

SHERMAN-OAKS.COM

SHORT-HILLS.ORG

SHOULD.COM

SHUNTAK.NET

SHUNTAK.ORG

SIMONYI.COM

SIPC.COM

SKELTON.COM

SNP500.COM

SPARWOOD.COM

SPORTUTILITYVEHICLE.COM

SSEA.COM

STEINBRUCH.COM

STMARYSPOINT.COM

STOCK-BROKERS.COM

STRATHAM.NET

STRATHAM.ORG

SUBOTNICK.COM

SULTANBRUNEI.COM

SULTANOFBRUNEI.COM

SULTANOFBRUNEI.NET

SUNDAE.COM

SUSKIND.COM

SYNAGOGUE.NET

SZLAM.COM

TAPPEN.COM

TECHNOLOGYSTOCK.COM

TEMBURONG.COM

TEWKESBURY.COM

THELAWS.COM

THE1VES.COM

TNA.COM

TOPFER.COM

TORESCO.COM

TOTCO.COM

TOYODA.COM

TRACINDA.COM

TSTOCK.COM

TUTONG.COM

TVBOOK.COM

UANDU.COM

*626 UIRYUNG.COM

UIRYUNG.NET

UIRYUNG.ORG

UNITED-KINGDOM.ORG

UNSTONE.COM

UNU.COM

U-U.COM

UUA.COM

YACATIONFAMILY.COM

YALBY.COM

VERGNES.COM

VERNON-HILLS.COM

VICTORIA.ORG

VINCIARELLI.COM

VIRTUALESTATE.COM

WALKER.WS

WAWASAN.COM

WBNEWS.COM

WEBERNET.COM

WEBERTEC.COM

WEBERTECHNOLOGIES.COM

WEBER-TECHNOLOGIES.COM

WEISGLASS.COM

WIDJAJA.COM

WILKENSON.COM

WILLIAMSLAKE.COM

WILLIS.ORG

WILLMOTH.COM

WINLUCK.COM

WIXOM.COM

WONOWIDJOJO.COM

WORKWATER.COM

WRIGHT.WS

WWWLIVE.COM

XANDX.COM

YAYASAN.COM

YAYASAN.NET

YAYASAN.ORG

YESTOLOVE.COM

YNY.COM

YTL.COM

Y-Y.COM

ZANDZ.COM

ZNB.COM

ZNZ.COM

ZWEBEN.NET

ZWEBEN.ORG

86. Network Solutions currently charges $29.00 for domain name registrations. (See http://www.networksolu-tions.com).

87. The domain name schmidheiny.com is currently registered with the registrar DirectNic. (See http://www.directnic.com/whois/?query=schmidheiny.com).

88. According to the whois record at DirectNic, the “creation date” for the domain name schmidheiny.com is 28-Feb-1999.

89. According to the Internet Names Worldwide web site they currently charge $85.00 per year per domain name for registrations and renewals. (See pricing button at http://inww.com).

90. According to the DirectNic web site they currently charge $15.00 per year for domain name registrations and renewals (See http://www.directnic.com/fea-tures/prices.)

DISCUSSION

The ACPA contains a prohibition on the use of personal names in domain names. 15 U.S.C. § 1129(1)(A) provides:

Any person who registers a domain name that consists of the name of another living person, or a name substantially and confusingly similar thereto, without that person’s consent, with the specific intent to profit from such name by selling the domain name for financial gain to that person or any third party, shall be liable in a civil action by such person.

Subsection (B) provides an exception for those who register personal names if such name is used in, affiliated with, or related to a work of authorship protected as a copyright under Title 17 of the U.S.Code. *627 Section 1129(2) provides the remedies available for violation of ACPA:

In any civil action brought under paragraph (1), a court may award injunctive relief, including the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the plaintiff. The court may also, in its discretion, award costs and attorneys fees to the prevailing party.

15 U.S.C. § 1129(2).

The elements of the cause of action established by the statute are straightforward. A person is liable under ACPA if he (1) registers a domain name; (2) that consists of the name of another living person (or one that is substantially and confusingly similar); (3) without that person’s consent; (4) with the intent to profit from selling that domain name to the person or a third party. The stipulated facts demonstrate that plaintiff has satisfied his burden of demonstrating each of these elements. Defendants registered the < schmidheiny.com > domain name. That domain name consists of the name of Stephan Schmidheiny, a living person. Plaintiff did not consent to the registration. Finally, the stipulation establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that defendants specifically intended to profit from the sale of the domain name to the plaintiff. That intent is established by defendants’ previous course of conduct of registering domain names of wealthy individuals and then selling or attempting to sell those domain names to those persons or others. That intent is also established by defendants’ e-mails to the plaintiff offering to sell the domain name for $1.1 million, while falsely implying that others were in competition with plaintiff to purchase the domain name.

Defendants argue that summary judgment is not appropriate on the issue of specific intent. Specifically, they assert that the offer to sell the domain name in November 2000 is not necessarily probative of their intent to profit from the registration of the domain name in June 2000, arguing that a jury could find based upon the defendants’ business plan to provide email addresses that the intent at the time of registration was not to sell, but to develop the domain name. Given the content of the stipulation, we cannot agree.

In deciding a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “the test is whether there.is a genuine issue of material fact and, if not, whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Medical Protective Co. v. Watkins, 198 F.3d 100, 103 (3d Cir. 1999) (citing Armbruster v. Unisys Corp., 32 F.3d 768, 777 (3d Cir. 1994)). As to materiality, the substantive law will identify which facts are material; only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Furthermore, “summary judgment will not lie if the dispute about a material fact is genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” Id. at 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505.

On a motion for summary judgment, the facts should be reviewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986)(quoting United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962)). The nonmoving party “must do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts,” Matsushita, 475 U.S. at 586, 106 S.Ct. 1348, and must produce more than a “mere scintilla” of evidence to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact and avoid summary judg *628 ment. See Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc., 974 F.2d 1358, 1373 (3d Cir. 1992).

Defendants’ argument that the offer to sell the domain name in November 2000 is not necessarily probative of their intent to profit from the registration of the domain name in June 2000 — because a jury could find based upon the defendants’ business plan to provide e-mail addresses that the intent at the time of registration was not to sell, but to develop the domain name— strikes the court as a textbook example of the type of “metaphysical doubt” described by Matsushita. The stipulation contains substantial evidence of defendants’ specific intent to profit from the registration of the domain name. This includes evidence that they are in the business of buying and selling domain names; have registered numerous domain names that include trademarked names, names of celebrities, and names of wealthy persons; have registered domain names of numerous persons on the Forbes list while having no apparent connection to these names; have profited from the sales of domain names to others on the list; the time lapse between the registration in June 2000 and the offer of sale in November 2000, was relatively brief; defendants falsely implied that plaintiff was in competition with others in the bidding for the domain name; and, at the same time they offered the domain name to plaintiff, defendants also put the name up for auction at a price that had no reasonable connection to its value to anyone other than the plaintiff. Finally, defendants have come forward with no evidence to raise a jury issue on their claim that they intended to “develop” the web site. The fact that they offer a free e-mail address to anyone at the website, does not negate the evidence of specific intent to sell the site for profit to the plaintiff.

Accordingly, we find that plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment, injunctive relief, including the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the plaintiff, and constitutes the prevailing party for the purposes of awarding costs and attorneys fees.

ORDER

The renewed motion of Stephan Schmi-dheiny for summary judgment (#40) is GRANTED.

Judgment on the merits is entered in favor of Stephan Schmidheiny and against Steven Weber d/b/a/ Domainsale and Fam-ology.com, Inc. and Famology.com, Inc.

Defendants Steven Weber d/b/a/ Do-mainsale and Famology.com, Inc. and Famology.com, Inc. are ORDERED to transfer the domain name < schmi-dheiny .com. > to the plaintiff Stephan Schmidheiny and are ENJOINED from registering a domain name substantially or confusingly similar to the <schmi-dheiny.com > domain name in the future.

Plaintiff Stephan Schmidheiny is DIRECTED to file an application for costs and attorney’s fees within twenty days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.