KALE v. HILL
KALE v. HILL
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WARREN KALE : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 19-3562 : JUDGE GLENNIS HILL, et al. :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Warren Kale’s pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241, and after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Document 5) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Kale’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241(Document 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Kale having failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, or that reasonable jurists would disagree with this Court’s ruling on Kale’s claims, a certificate of appealability shall not issue. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 483- 84 (2000). 4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case close. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.
1 The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on September 27, 2019, together with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any objections within 14 days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) (“Any party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.”). To date, no objections have been received by the Court.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown