WILLIAMS v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

WILLIAMS v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARQUISE WILLIAMS, : Civil No. 1:18-cv-2337 : Petitioner, : : v. : : WARDEN BRADLEY, : : Respondent. : Judge Sylvia H. Rambo

O R D E R Before the court is a report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab in which she recommends that the court dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Objections to the report and recommendation were due by August 8, 2019, and to date no objections have been filed. In considering whether to adopt a report and recommendation when no objections have been filed, the court should, as a matter of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc.,

702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469

(M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error). Following an independent review of the record, the court is satisfied that the report and recommendation contains no clear error and will therefore adopt the recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED. 2) The petition brought under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

is DISMISSED.

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 4) Any appeal taken from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

Dated: September 11, 2019

Reference

Status
Unknown