HAMILTON v. SMITH

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

HAMILTON v. SMITH

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONALD GLENN HAMILTON, ) ) Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-0027 Petitioner, ) ) V. ) Senior United States District Judge ) Kim R. Gibson BARRY SMITH, Superintendent, ) PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF ) PROBATION AND PAROLE, and ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ) PENNSYLVANIA, ) ) Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Ronald Glenn Hamilton (ECF No. 3) and the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy recommending that the Petition be denied and that no certificate of appealability be issued. (ECF No. 10). Petitioner was served with the Report and Recommendation at his listed address and was advised that he had until July 26, 2019, to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any objections. '

Ifa party does not file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the party may lose its right to de novo review by the district court, although the court must still give “reasoned consideration” to the magistrate judge’s report before adopting it. Henderson v. Carlson,

812 F.2d 874, 878-79

(3d Cir. 1987). The district court should, as a matter of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes.

The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the Report and Recommendation correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, after de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus will be denied. An appropriate Order follows. BY THE CQURI: .

Wr. ‘ Kim R. Gibson Senior United States District Judge Dated: August 4 , 2019 cc: RONALD GLENN HAMILTON EC-1652 SCI Houtzdale PO Box 1000 Houtzdale, PA 16698-1000 (via U.S. First Class Mail) Morgan C. Davis PA Board of Probation and Parole (via ECF electronic notification)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONALD GLENN HAMILTON, ) ) Civil Action No, 3:19-cv-0027 Petitioner, ) ) Vv. ) Senior United States District Judge ) KimR. Gibson BARRY SMITH, Superintendent, ) PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF ) PROBATION AND PAROLE, and ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ) PENNSYLVANIA, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER AND NOW, this | 7A day of August, 2019, in accordance with the foregoing Memorandum Opinion issued on this date, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Inasmuch as reasonable jurists would not find it debatable that Petitioner has failed to substantially allege the denial of a constitutional right, must less show such a denial, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. The Report and Recommendation filed July 8, 2019 (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Ww ) \ .

Kim R. Gibson Senior United States District Judge cc: RONALD GLENN HAMILTON EC-1652 SCI Houtzdale PO Box 1000 Houtzdale, PA 16698-1000 (via U.S. First Class Mail) Morgan C. Davis PA Board of Probation and Parole (via ECF electronic notification)

Reference

Status
Unknown