CALDWELL v. BYRNE
CALDWELL v. BYRNE
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FALEEF CALDWELL, : CIVIL ACTION : Petitioner, : : v. : : NO. 20-223 DAVID BYRNE, et al., : : Respondents. : JOHN M. YOUNGE, J. ORDER AND NOW, this _1_6_t_h_ day of _O__ct_o_b_e_r_________, 2020, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(ECF No. 1), the Response thereto (ECF No. 9), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (ECF No. 11), and after a careful and independent review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000). 4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT:
_/_s_/ _Jo_h_n_ _M__il_to_n_ _Y_o_u_n_g_e____________ JOHN M. YOUNGE, J.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown