Bennett v. PrimeCare Medical Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Bennett v. PrimeCare Medical Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL BENNETT, Plaintiff, NO. 3:18-cv-517 v. | (JUDGE CAPUTO) PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC., et al. Defendants. ORDER NOW, this 5th day of February, 2020, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 63) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63) is ADOPTED. (2) Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motions (Docs. 43 and 46) are GRANTED.' (3) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and AGAINST Plaintiff on all claims. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.

/s/ A, Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo | United States District Judge As explained by Magistrate Judge Carlson, the action could also be dismissed for failure to prosecute in accordance with Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.,

747 F.2d 863

(3d Cir. 1984).

Reference

Status
Unknown