Reppert v. Berryhill
Reppert v. Berryhill
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KATHLEEN MATILDA REPPERT, NO. 3:19-cv-0878
Plaintiff, (SAPORITO, M.J.) v.
ANDREW SAUL1, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM The plaintiff, Kathleen Matilda Reppert, brought this action under
42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Among other grounds for appeal, Reppert contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) who heard and decided her case was
1 Andrew Saul was sworn in as Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019. He is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security). The caption in this case is amended to reflect this change. not properly appointed under the Appointments Clause of the United
States Constitution, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2, and therefore she is entitled to a remand for rehearing of her case before a constitutionally appointed ALJ. The plaintiff’s administrative hearing was held on April
4, 2018, which occurred prior to July 16, 2018, the date when the Acting Commissioner ratified the appointment of ALJs and approved their appointments as her own to address any Appointments Clause questions
involving social security benefits claims. See Soc. Sec. Ruling 19-1p,
2019 WL 1324866, at *2; see also U.S. Soc. Sec. Admin., EM-180003 REV 2 (Feb. 6, 2019), available at https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/reference.nsf/
links/08062018021025PM. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission,
138 S. Ct. 2044(2018), and the Third Circuit’s
recent decision in Cirko ex rel. Cirko v. Commissioner of Social Security,
948 F.3d 148(3d Cir. 2020), we will direct that the Commissioner’s decision be VACATED and REMANDED for rehearing before a different,
constitutionally appointed ALJ. See Lucia,
138 S. Ct. at 2055; Cirko, 948 F.3d at 159–60. We further direct that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of the plaintiff, and that the Clerk mark this case as CLOSED.
Dated: April 3, 2020
s/Joseph F. Saporito, Jr. JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR. United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown