DENNIS v. WETZEL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

DENNIS v. WETZEL

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERIC LEON DENNIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-1348 ) v. ) Judge Robert J. Colville ) Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan JOHN WETZEL, Secretary, ) Pennsylvania Department of ) Corrections, STEPHEN ZAPPALA, ) District Attorney of Allegheny County, ) and JOSHUA SHAPIRO, Attorney ) General of Pennsylvania, ) ) Respondents. )

ORDER OF COURT

Before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(ECF No. 1) filed by Petitioner Eric Leon Dennis. On March 31, 2020, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) in which she recommended that the Court dismiss the Petition as untimely and deny a certificate of appealability. Petitioner filed timely Objections (ECF No. 20) to the Report and Recommendation on April 8, 2020. The district court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections are made.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C); see also Henderson v. Carlson,

812 F.2d 874, 877

(3d Cir. 1987). This Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The district court judge may also recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Upon review of the March 31, 2020 Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objections, as well as a review of the entire record in this matter, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled and the Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of the Court. Further, with respect to Petitioner’s request that this Court appoint counsel, such a request has already been addressed by Judge Lenihan’s September 6, 2019 Order (ECF No. 15) denying Petitioner’s Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 14). This Court finds that there is no basis to revisit

that decision. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as untimely. The Court finds that, because jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether Petitioner’s claims should be dismissed, Petitioner is not entitled to the issuance of a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, the Court denies a certificate of appealability in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Robert J. Colville Robert J. Colville United States District Judge

Dated: April 30, 2020 cc: Eric Leon Dennis KJ-8881 SCI Fayette 48 Overlook Drive LaBelle, PA 15450

Counsel of record (Via CM/ECF electronic mail)

Reference

Status
Unknown