IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DORIAN JACKSON and TAMIKA CIVIL ACTION JACKSON

NO. 20-6434 v.

HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2021, upon review of Plaintiffs’ Corrected Motion for Remand (ECF 8) and Defendant’s Opposition thereto (ECF 9), and for the reasons and authorities cited in Sultan v. AIG Casualty Insurance, No. 20-935,

(E.D. Pa. Aug. 10, 2020) (Schiller, J.), Plaintiffs’ Corrected Motion for Remand is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ Initial Motion for Remand (ECF 7) is also DENIED as MOOT. BY THE COURT:

s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

O:\CIVIL 20\20-6434 Jackson v. Home Depot\20cv6434 order denying motion for remand 02102021.docx