PRICE v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

PRICE v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MAURICE M. PRICE, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF NO. 19-5263 PROBATION AND PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent.

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition, amendments, response, and available state court records, there being no timely objection filed by petitioner and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED. 3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this ruling. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); and 4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT:

/s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. __ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Reference

Status
Unknown