IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SULIMAN ALI, : : Petitioner, : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : MR. K. KUFFMAN, et al., : No. 21-cv-04518-HB : Respondents. : ORDER AND NOW this _24th_day of _January_, 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Suliman Ali’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1), and the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Mr. Ali’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice by separate Judgment, filed contemporaneously with this Order. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a); Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 12; 3. No certificate of appealability shall issue under

(c)(1)(A) because “the applicant has [not] made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right[,]” under

(c)(2), since he has not demonstrated that “reasonable jurists” would find my “assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel,

(2000); see United States v. Cepero,

(3d Cir. 2000), abrogated on other grounds by Gonzalez v. Thaler,

(2012); and, 4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this file closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III HON. HARVEY BARTLE United States District Judge