UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD BEST, : :CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-1599 Plaintiff, : Vv. : (JUDGE MARIANI) FILED HUNTINGDON, et al., : SCRANTON Defendants. FEB @ 2.2922 : Por ORDER DEPUTY CLERK

THIS > NAW .___. DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022, upon consideration of the “Pro se Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment for Attorney” (Doc. 17) filed by Plaintiff Ronald Best, because the above-captioned civil matter was closed on February 4, 2020, (Doc. 16), no additional matters are pending before the Court, and Plaintiff is requesting an attorney only to review his case (id. at 1), the Court has no basis upon which to conclude that Plaintiff is entitled to the appointment of counsel, see, e.g., Montgomery v. Pinchak,

(3d Cir. 2002); Tabron v. Grace,

(3d Cir. 1993), AND ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 17) is DENIED.

Robert D~Mariant United States District Judge