SHOATZ v. FARRELL
SHOATZ v. FARRELL
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MAURICE SHOATZ : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-2165 : MICHELLE FARRELL, et al. :
ORDER
This 13th day of March, 2023, upon careful and independent consideration of Maurice Shoatz’ petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF 2), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (ECF 17), and the Petitioner’s objections (ECF 19), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;1 3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED; 4. A certificate of appealability shall not issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000); and
1 In his objections to Magistrate Judge Wells’ Report and Recommendation, Shoatz for the first time argues that his attorney withdrew Shoatz’ interlocutory appeal to the Superior Court without his permission. Shoatz thus argues that he has in fact exhausted state court remedies by seeking appellate review in the form of the interlocutory appeal that was allegedly withdrawn without his permission. Regardless of the facts underlying the withdrawal of Shoatz’ interlocutory appeal, Shoatz has not exhausted state court remedies because he retains the right to appeal an adverse outcome to the Superior Court after the conclusion of the Court of Common Pleas proceedings. Furthermore, Shoatz has not demonstrated “extraordinary circumstances” to justify setting aside the exhaustion requirement. See Sleets v. Pennsylvania, No. CV 16-930,
2017 WL 8683557, at *5 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 16-930,
2018 WL 1570814(E.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2018) (quoting Moore v. DeYoung,
515 F.2d 437, 442-43(3d Cir. 1975). 5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown