IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT NATHAN, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff : v. : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, : Acting Commissioner of the Social : Security Administration, : NO. 19-2874 Defendant : ORDER Vv AND NOW, this 2? day of August, 2023, upon consideration of the Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), Plaintiff's Answer thereto (Docket No. 18), and after review! of the Report and Recommendation of Untted States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Doc. No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

PEE oa $A the fl Ler, ENE E.K., PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

No party filed objections to Magistrate Judge Wells’s Report and Recommendation. “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee motes; see also Henderson v. Carlson,

(3d Cir. 1987) (noting that “in the absence of objections, .. . the better practice is for the district court judge to afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report” and recommendation). This Court has discretion to “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge,” regardless of whether objections have been made.

(b)(1). Upon review, the Court finds no clear error in the Report and Recommendation.