Lucero-Deras v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Lucero-Deras v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE LUCERO-DERAS, : Petitioner : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-0817 (JUDGE MANNION) WARDEN, FCI-ALLENWOOD, : Respondent :

MEMORANDUM Petitioner, Jose Lucero-Deras, an inmate confined in the Federal

Correctional Institution, White Deer, Pennsylvania, filed the above captioned petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §2241

. (Doc. 4, petition). Lucero-Deras claims the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has unlawfully denied him Earned Time Credits under the First Step Act (FSA).

Id.

For relief, Petitioner seeks “the Court to order the respondent to apply FSA time

credits.”

Id.

A response was filed on June 28, 2023, indicating that Petitioner

has a final order of removal against him and is not eligible for earned credits.

(Doc. 6). For the reasons set forth below, the instant petition will be denied.

l. Background On August 18, 2021, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York sentenced Lucero-Deras to a forty-six month sentence following his conviction for Conspiracy to Commit Alien Smuggling and Alien Smuggling. (Doc. 6-1 at 6). He has a projected release date of December 27, 2023, via good conduct time release.

Id.

On June 16, 2023, a Detainer Action Letter was issued based on “a final Order of Removal against the alien.” (Doc. 6-1 at 8).

ll. Discussion Under the FSA, the Attorney General was charged with the development and release of a Risk and Needs Assessment System within 210 days of December 21, 2018, the date on which the FSA was enacted. See

18 U.S.C. §3632

. This System is to be used for: (1) determining an inmate’s recidivism risk; (2) assessing an inmate’s risk of violent or serious misconduct; (3) determining the type and amount of evidence-based recidivism reduction (“EBRR”) programming appropriate for each inmate; (4) periodically assessing an inmate's recidivism risk; (5) reassigning an inmate to appropriate EBRRs and productive activities (“PA”); (6) determining when

-2-

to provide incentives and rewards for successful participation in EBRRs and PAs; and (7) determining when the inmate is ready to transfer to pre-release custody or supervised release. See

id.

§3632(a). Moreover, this system provides guidance on the “type, amount, and intensity of EBRR programs and PAs to be assigned to each inmate based on the inmate's specific criminogenic needs.” See Kurti v. White, No. 1:19-2019,

2020 WL 2063871

, at *4 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2020)(citing

18 U.S.C. §3632

(b)). The FSA allows eligible inmates who successfully complete EBRRs or PAs to receive earned time credits to be applied toward time in pre-release custody or supervised release. See

18 U.S.C. §3632

(d)(4)(A). An inmate

may earn ten (10) days of credit for every thirty (30) days of successful participation. See

id.

Moreover, eligible inmates who have been assessed at

a minimum or low risk of recidivism who do not increase their risk of recidivism over two (2) consecutive assessments may earn five (5) days of time credit for every thirty (30) days of successful participation. See

id.

However, an inmate is ineligible to apply ECTs if the inmate is “the subject of a final order of removal under any provision of the immigration laws.”

18 U.S.C. §3632

(d)(4)(E).'

1 Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. S8632

(C MEN

Here, Respondent presented evidence that Petitioner is subject to a deportation order and that the BOP properly determined that Petitioner is not

eligible for application of FSA time credits.

18 U.S.C. §3632

(d)(4)(E)(i); see also Ramirez v. Sage,

2022 WL 2318693

(M.D. Pa. June 28, 2022) (denying habeas relief to inmate pursuant to

18 U.S.C. §3632

(d)(4)(E) based on

evidence of a deportation order). As such, the Court will deny Lucero-Deras' petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Ill. Conclusion For the reasons stated above, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus will be DENIED. /

MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Dated: July //, 2023 23-0817-01

In general.—A prisoner is ineligible to apply time credits under subparagraph (C) if the prisoner is the subject of a final order of removal under any provision of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)).

18 U.S.C. §3632

(d)(4)(E)(i). -4-

Reference

Status
Unknown