Pearce v. OMALLEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JESSICA PEARCE, No. 1:23-CV-01175 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. (Chief Magistrate Judge Bloom) MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ORDER DECEMBER 11, 2024 Jessica Pearce filed this action seeking review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Pearce’s claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.1 On September 19, 2024, Chief Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision.2 No timely objections were filed to this Report and Recommendation.

Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, this Court will review the recommendation only for clear error.3 Regardless of whether timely objections are made, district courts may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in Docs. 1, 11.

2 Doc. 19.

3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987) (explaining that court should in some manner review recommendations part—the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.4 Upon review of the record, the Court finds no error—clear or otherwise—in Chief Magistrate Judge Bloom’s conclusion that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Consequently, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Chief Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED; 2. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; 3. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Pearce pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge

4 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.31.