REDMOND v. WETZEL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
REDMOND v. WETZEL
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAQUAWAN REDMOND
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-2652 WETZEL, et al.
ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2024, for the reasons stated in the Order approving the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without a hearing. 2. A certificate of appealability will not issue as there is no basis for concluding that “reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further;”1 and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J
1 Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000) (internal citation and quotation omitted).
Reference
- Status
- Unknown