REDMOND v. WETZEL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

REDMOND v. WETZEL

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DAQUAWAN REDMOND

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-2652 WETZEL, et al.

ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2024, for the reasons stated in the Order approving the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without a hearing. 2. A certificate of appealability will not issue as there is no basis for concluding that “reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further;”1 and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J

1 Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000) (internal citation and quotation omitted).

Reference

Status
Unknown