IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________

ISA ALI-YUZON GAUS, : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil No. 2:24-cv-01271-JMG : MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT : ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., : : Defendants. : __________________________________________

ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2025, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 2), Respondent’s Response in Opposition to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 10), and The Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (ECF No. 15), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:1 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED as moot. 3. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. 4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

1 “Where a habeas petition has been referred to the magistrate for a Report and Recommendation, the district court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections have been made.” Enriques v. Dist. Att'y of Cnty. of Phila.,

, at *2 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 2022). In cases such as this one where no objections have been made, the Third Circuit has held that “the better practice is for the district judge to afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report.” Henderson v. Carlson,

(3d Cir. 1987). 5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John M. Gallagher JOHN M. GALLAGHER United States District Court Judge