UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEVE WOODEN, : Petitioner, : : Case No. 2:23-cv-1366 v. : : SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA, : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT : ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, : Respondents. :

O R D E R AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2025, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), ECF No. 23, is DENIED and DISMISSED.1

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge

1 To the extent the motion could be construed as a successive petition under

, a certificate of appealability is denied because Wooden has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, nor would jurists of reason find the Court’s assessment debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel,

(2000). 1