IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMIR HAMILTON, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION v. No. 25-5177 SUPERINTENDENT BOHINSKI et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2025, upon review of the pleadings (Dkt. Nos. 6–7, 9), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Dkt. No. 10) and Petitioner’s objections thereto (Dkt. No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The objections are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE as are the Motion to Send Hamilton His Mugshot, (Dkt. No. 7), and Motion for Leave to Amend His Petition, (Dkt. No. 9). 4. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural aspects of this decision. See

(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel,

(2000); and 5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

_/s_/_ G__e_r_a_l_d_ _J_._ P__a_p__p_e_r_t_ __ GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.