Wilberson Severe Dalicier v. American Express
Wilberson Severe Dalicier v. American Express
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILBERSON SEVERE DALICIER, : Civil No. 1:25-CV-00583 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : AMERICAN EXPRESS, : : Defendant. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson ORDER Before the court is the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Caraballo recommending that the court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice as frivolous and malicious. (Doc. 8.) No party has filed objections to the report and recommendation, resulting in the forfeiture of de novo review by this court. Nara v. Frank,
488 F.3d 187, 194(3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson,
812 F.2d 874, 878–79 (3d Cir. 1987)). Following an independent review of the report and record, and affording “reasoned consideration” to the uncontested portions of the report, EEOC v. City of Long Branch,
866 F.3d 93, 100(3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), to “satisfy [the court] that there is no clear error on the face of the record,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, the court finds that Judge Caraballo’s analysis is well-reasoned and fully supported by the record and applicable law. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1) The report and recommendation, Doc. 8, is ADOPTED.
2) Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. s/Jennifer P. Wilson JENNIFER P. WILSON United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dated: December 16, 2025
Reference
- Status
- Unknown