Robert Pauletta v. Officer Sanguinito, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT PAULETTA, : Civil No. 1:24-CV-01299 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : OFFICER SANGUINITO, et al., : : Defendants. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson MEMORANDUM Before the court is the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni recommending that Defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted and Plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 42.) No party has filed objections to the report and recommendation, resulting in the forfeiture of de novo review by this court. Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878–79 (3d Cir. 1987)).

Following an independent review of the report and record, and affording “reasoned consideration” to the uncontested portions of the report, EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), to “satisfy [the court] that there is no clear error on the face of the record,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, the court finds that Judge Camoni’s analysis is well-reasoned and fully supported by the record and applicable law. Accordingly, the court will adopt the report and recommendation, Doc. 42, grant the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Officer Sanguinito and Andrew Parsons, Doc. 34, grant the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Michael Carroll, Doc. 35, dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint with prejudice, Doc. 32, and close this case. An appropriate order follows.

s/Jennifer P. Wilson JENNIFER P. WILSON United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania Dated: March 2, 2026