Carlos Manuel Balestier-Marrero v. Bradley Booher

| IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA | CARLOS MANUEL BALESTIER- : No. 3:25-CV-2155 | MARRERO, : Petitioner : : (Judge Munley) V. : | BRADLEY BOOHER, Respondent : ORDER AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS | ORDERED that: | 1. Petitioner Carlos Manuel Balestier-Marrero’s petition for a writ of habeas | corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED.

2. Acertificate of appealability shall not issue, as Balestier-Marrero has | failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional | right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this court’s procedural ruling is correct, Slack v. | McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). | 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. | Date: | lL}; . □□ Ot COURT: | JUDGE JULIA K. MUNLE | nited States