Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1930

Urbanus v. Turowskl

Urbanus v. Turowskl
Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas · Decided January 11, 1930 · Jones
14 Pa. D. & C. 546; 1930 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 487

Counsel

Charles M. Bowman, for plaintiff; John J. Aponick, for defendant.

Urbanus v. Turowskl

Opinion of the Court

Jones, J.,

This is a suit in assumpsit to recover the value of certain merchandise of the kind and for the prices set forth in a copy of the book account attached to plaintiff’s statement, which discloses that the first item is a debit balance on merchandise of $419‘.73. Then follows an itemized account of articles delivered afterwards and the price charged, and a balance due for which suit is instituted.

This statement is wholly defective and insufficient. Defendant is entitled to be informed of the item of $419.73, balance on merchandise. This item is not sufficiently specific to inform the defendant and to call upon him for an affidavit of defense. Therefore, the rule is made absolute and plaintiff is directed to file a more specific statement as herein suggested.

From Frank P. Slattery, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.