Bailey v. Zielinski
Opinion of the Court
for court en banc,
—This case was submitted to the court en banc without argument. A brief was furnished by defendant’s counsel, but none was received on behalf of plaintiffs.
We think the result reached in the adjudication was correct. However, notwithstanding the expiration of the two years from the time the property was purchased by the county commissioners at treasurer’s sale, plaintiffs had the right, under the provisions of the Act of
We conclude that the decree nisi was proper.
The exceptions are dismissed and we enter the following
Final decree
Upon due consideration, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed:
1. That the bill of plaintiffs be and the same is hereby dismissed.
2. That plaintiffs, within 30 days, deliver possession of the premises to defendant.
3. That plaintiffs pay defendant, as mesne profits, and as damages for illegal detention, the sum of $75 per month for each month they occupy or remain in possession of the property on and after September 1, 1946.
4. That plaintiffs pay the costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.