Long v. Swavely

Opinion by

EXCEPTIONS:

1. There was no complaint filed such as is required by the Act of Assembly to give jurisdiction to the Justice.

2. The record does not show that the proper proofs were made before the Justice whereby he was warranted in entering judgment.

3. The record does not show proof of a demand for the rent, as required by law.

4. The record does not show the term of the lease.

5. The record does not show when the notice to quit was served, what the notice contained and that there was a demand for the amount of rent claimed, accompanying the notice.

6. The record does not show the amount of rent reserved, nor any of the terms of the lease.

7. The record does not show that the amount 'of rent in arrears and the costs were endorsed on the writ of possession.

*808. The record fails to show a compliance with the requirements of the Act of Assembly in such case made and provided, authorizing the institution of the proceedings and the necessary proofs and findings of fact to sustain a judgment.

9. The record is fatally defective in sundry other legal essentials.

And now, November 13, 1902, the exceptions are sustained and the proceedings are set aside and reversed.

By the Court.