Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1790

Bowen v. Douglass

Bowen v. Douglass
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas · Decided August 15, 1790
2 U.S. 43 (United States Reports)

Counsel

M'Kean, for the Defendant,

Bowen v. Douglass

Opinion of the Court

But,

BY THE COURT:

β€”It is questionable, whether the act of Assembly empowers us to issue writs of attachment into another County; and there are other modes of proceeding, equally efficient, and clear of any doubt. It is unnecessary, however, to enlarge at present on this topic; as the Plaintiff has evidently done all in his power to procure the attendance of the witnesses; and the refusal of his overture to take their depositions, is a strong additional circumstance in his favor. The cause must, therefore, be continued, subject to the rule for trial at the next term, or Non Pros: And, in the mean time, we direct, on our own authority, a rule to be entered for taking the depositions of infirm witnesses de bene esse; to be read in evidence upon the trial, in case of death, or inability to attend. To that extent only, however, do we grant the rule; for, we think it would be going too far to add, that the depositions shall be read, in case the witnesses depart from the State.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.