Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1837

Comly v. Goldsmith

Comly v. Goldsmith
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas · Decided September 11, 1837
2 Miles 133

Counsel

Heiskell, for rule., Brashears, contra.

Comly v. Goldsmith

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.—

This affidavit is altogether insufficient. The nature of the indebtedness is not stated, or the contract or transaction on which it is founded.

Rule absolute.a

Vide Kelly v. Kintzing; Benedict v. Whartenby; McCanles v. Frederickson and Young v. Corder, in this volume, and the index.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.