Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1837

Kensington Bank v. Wilkinson

Kensington Bank v. Wilkinson
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas · Decided December 13, 1837
2 Miles 166

Counsel

Chew, for plaintiff., Castor, for defendant.

Kensington Bank v. Wilkinson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.—

The defendant had an opportunity to move for his discharge from arrest under the capias ad satisfaciendum, according to the 15th and 16th sections of the act of 16th June, 1836. (Stroud’s Purd. tit. Insolvents.) Of that statutory remedy *167ho failed to avail himself, but voluntarily gave the bond on which the suit is brought. Under such circumstances, the bond is good under the statute, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover on it.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.